Does nothing matter? It shouldn’t do. After all, nothing is …well… nothing.

But…if everything started from nothing, so we are told, then nothing must contain the seeds of everything.

How could everything come from nothing?

In fact, how does anything come from nothing?

And if it did, would that mean that nothing is something?

Questions, questions….

That’s what this website is about: questions.

Questions about nothing.

 
Buy the book and let’s
start talking about nothing:
Amazon UK
Amazon US
 

12 Responses to Home

  1. brisingr says:

    Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I get actually loved account your weblog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing on your feeds or even I achievement you get right of entry to persistently rapidly.

  2. Nothing matters? But then, what does matter(s) mean. Vacuous emptiness from which all matter arises. Even CERN hasn’t been successful as of yesterday.

  3. Neil Kenning says:

    .

  4. Susan Coppard says:

    You might like this:

    I can prove that jam tarts are better than heaven:
    Jam tarts are better than nothing, right?
    But nothing is better than heaven.
    Therefore jam tarts are better than nothing.

    Or as King Lear said to Cordelia: “Nothing will come of nothing!”
    And the Gershwin song goes: “I got plenty of nothin’ and nothin’s plenty for me”.

  5. Zachary says:

    I like the way you look at existence but really nothing is something. The absence of anything calls for the existence of something be it a void or black hole or awkward silence. So really we are everything and nothing.

    As soon as you create something, you create its opposition, nothing, as soon as there is nothing there is something.

    In the end when your physical existence ends all that matters is if you die in comfort with your life.

  6. Ronald Green says:

    Thanks for that Zachary.

    If you have read my book, you will know that I differentiate between Nothing (the absence of everything) and nothingness (the absence of something). As such, your comments refer to nothingness, which, I agree, is something. And you are right that as soon as you create something, there is its opposite.

    This, however, does not work with Nothing (the absence of everything). The absence of everything includes ourselves, so that we would not be around to be exposed to anything. When there is Nothing, there isn’t anything.

    When our physical existence ends, nothing matters.

  7. Tyrone D. Miller says:

    What do you discern from Ecclesiastes 1:18?

  8. Ronald Green says:

    Tyrone, you mean the more we know, the more miserable we will be? If that means that we are happy when we are ignorant, I don’t agree. It is rather an arrogant and elitist statement.

    But what is the connection to “nothing”? Is it that if we know nothing, we will be happy?

  9. Tyrone D. Miller says:

    The less we know the better off we are?

  10. Ronald Green says:

    Isn’t that what Ecclesiastes 1:18 says, in effect?

  11. Karl says:

    Skimmed through this at Barnes and Noble the other day… looks very well written. Wondering if you relate this subject to Eastern perspectives of Advaita/nonduality?

    -k

  12. Ronald Green says:

    Thanks, Karl. In the chapter “Believing in Nothing” I look at a wide spectrum of religions and examine how they relate to “nothing”, and note a common denominator. I also compare how Western monotheistic religions and Eastern religions relate to “nothing”, and find that while ostensibly “nothing” is important – essential – to both, they are, in fact, different “nothings”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>